By now, authors and publishers of sociology and psychology
textbooks are bidding on the rights to that image from this weekend in
Washington D.C. with the group of boys
from the Catholic high school and the Native American man drumming. This is an ideal illustration of confirmation
bias. The image provokes strong
reactions, that vary widely, and which are set deeply almost immediately.
As video was made available that provided a context to the
original image, it offered an opportunity for people to reconsider their
original impression of the picture. In
the interest of full disclosure, this had a profound effect on my
impression. For many people, the
impression they got from the first impression was set so deeply that the only
effect of seeing the contextual video was to validate that first
impression. The presence of ‘MAGA’ hats
on the heads of many of these boys, and the fact that they were in Washington
to promote laws that would be more restrictive on did much to promote a division
among those viewing the video. An
individual’s feelings about Donald Trump, or abortion rights could create a
strong bias for or against these boys.
The contextual video revealed the presence of a third group
involved that were not seen in the original image. A group called the Black Hebrew Israelites
had been in a taunting confrontation with the boys from the Catholic school –
and it appeared that the Native American group had placed themselves between
these two groups. Again, this move was
subject to interpretation; was it intended as a peaceful intervention, or a
heavy-handed assertion of power? This
then returns the viewer to the original image of the drummer, and the Catholic
school kids. Were they chanting along
with the Native Americans in a respectful way, or making fun of them. As the drummer and the young man in the
center of the original image came close together, and each stood their ground,
was this a case of intimidation, or a more innocent proximity … and if
intimidation, who was initiating it?
The reactions I read on social media were all over the map on
interpretation of the body language, both in the original image, and in the
surrounding context. How do we interpret
the young man’s facial expression? Was
it a smirk, or a more innocent neutral expression? Can we know from outside? What factors influenced his response, as well
as the response of the Native American drummer?
Did each expect the other to back up?
Is there any reason either should have expected that of the other?
No comments:
Post a Comment